Welcome to The Senate Site

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Conservative marries progressive

So, last year we passed some serious tax reform, set to take effect in 12 days. Some said it would result in a more regressive system.

Turns out, it didn't.

Here's Dan Harrie in the Trib:
Utah's new 5 percent "flat tax" income tax kicks in Jan. 1 and, if politicians' promises prove true, it will be cheaper and simpler for most residents.

But a new University of Utah study also says that - contrary to conventional wisdom - it also will be somewhat more progressive than the old sliding-scale bracketed income tax.

For those who like their sources raw, here's the CPPA Study.

| More

3 Comments:

Anonymous John Dougall said...

Unfortunately, it's not a flat tax (as Gov Walker proposed). It's a single rate tax. By definition, a flat tax is not regressive. It's proportional.

12/19/2007 10:30 PM  
Anonymous Ethan said...

"By definition, a flat tax is not regressive. It's proportional."

Semantics.

12/20/2007 3:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Semantics! Ethan, don't be so blind to the actual meaning of words. Or maybe you were joking. Hope so. There's a big difference between regressive and proportional, and John's right.

12/21/2007 3:29 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

    Senate Site Feed

Home | Profiles | Archive | Links | Official Information | About | Contact | Government 2.0 Lab | Back to Top
© 2008. All rights reserved. Designed by Jeremy Wright & His Brother-In-Law